raccs lawphil|CSC Resolution 1701077: 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in : Pilipinas Compilation of the past and current UP Policies issued by the Board of Regents (BOR).
Pag-IBIG acquired assets are properties taken over from the borrowers who failed to meet their Pag-IBIG housing loan repayment plans. These assets are then considered foreclosed properties. This results in three scenarios, all of which will generate income for the Pag-IBIG Fund. First, Pag-IBIG has the right to place these properties in .
raccs lawphil,Ruling of the CSC Regional Office No. XI. By Decision 20 dated April 8, 2016, the CSC Regional Office No. XI found respondent guilty of serious dishonesty, grave misconduct, .the Commis. on.Rule 2JURISDICTION AND VENUE OF ACTION. Section 5. Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission. – The Civil Service Commission shall hear and decide . A compilation of rules, regulations, policies, guidelines, orders, circulars, statutes and jurisprudence relating to the Philippine Civil Service. The 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service (RACCS) became effective on August 17, 2017. Therefore, can be used in resolving cases starting .The RACCS provides that back salaries should be awarded corresponding to the period of the unwarranted preventive suspension which was based on an order of preventive . Compilation of the past and current UP Policies issued by the Board of Regents (BOR). CSC Resolution 1101502: Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service (RRACCS)
This document outlines new rules on administrative cases in the Civil Service, known as the 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service (2017 RACCS). The rules cover .Created Date: 6/22/2020 5:58:16 PMSTEFANI C. SAÑO, PETITIONER, VS. SUBIC BAY METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY, RESPONDENT. The present petition seeks to reverse and set aside the Decision 1 dated April 16, 2015 and Resolution 2 dated February 4, 2016 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 131302. The CA affirmed the Decision 3 dated May 20, 2013 of the Civil .
G.R. No. 204766. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY ENRIQUE T. ONA, Petitioner. vs. GLORIA B. AQUINTEY, EDUARDO F. MENDOZA AND AGNES N. VILLANUEVA, Respondents. D E C I S I O N. PERALTA, J.: Before the Court is a petition for review on certiorari seeking the reversal and setting aside of the Decision 1 .The Court's Ruling. The Court approves and adopts the OCA's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation as contained in its April 28, 2015 Memorandum. In Atty. Jaso v. Londres, 45 the Court held that willful failure to pay just debts is administratively punishable and a ground for disciplinary action.
CSC Resolution 1701077: 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in While the 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service (2017 RACCS) now classifies “habitual tardiness in reporting for duty” as a grave offense punishable by suspension of six (6) months and one (1) day to one (1) year for the first offense, and dismissal from the service for the second offense, the penalty for habitual .
6 Via a Joint Affidavit dated September 16, 2010 signed by Assistant Solicitor Roman Del Rosario and Associate Solicitors Ma. Christina Lim, Julie Mercurio, Sharone Rodriguez, Aristotle Mejia and Jose Covarrubias, rollo (GR. No. 224651), p. 142. 7 Counter Affidavit (Gutierrez), id. at 62-63. 8 Supra note 6, at 143.The Court agrees with the JIB's findings as to respondent's culpability but modifies its findings as regards the administrative offense violated and the corresponding penalty in accordance with Rule 140 of the Rules of Court, as amended by A.M. No. 21-08-09-SC 17 (Revised Rule 140). In A.M. No. 18-01-05-SC 18 dated October 2, 2018 and July 7 .
The Lawphil Project - Philippine Laws and Jurisprudence Databank. Featured Document Other Projects of the Foundation; Re: Show cause order in the decision dated May 11, 2018 in G.R. No. 237428 (Republic of the Philippines, represented by Solicitor General Jose Calida v. Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno) G.R. No. 212641. ANGELICA A. FAJARDO, Petitioner. vs. MARIO J. CORRAL, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. TIJAM, J.: Before Us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, which seeks to annul and set aside the Decision 1 dated September 16, 2013 and Resolution 2 dated May 9, 2014 of the Court .It is also noteworthy that RRACCS, as well as the RACCS, define a "disciplining authority" to be the person or body "duly authorized to impose the penalty" provided for by law or rules.30 Hence, read in conjunction with the relevant provisions of the Administrative Code above-quoted, the disciplinary authority, i.e., the power to impose penalty .In particular, the Report stated that on May 28, 2019, at approximately 3:47 p.m., Household Attendant II Emilyn Janaban (Janaban) was heading to Room 107 of the Training Center to assist a guest. It was at this time that Janaban observed that a woman proceeded inside a nearby room, particularly, Room 110, and who was closely followed by Garra.
Disciplinary Jurisdiction.—. (1) The Commission shall decide upon appeal all administrative disciplinary cases involving the imposition of a penalty of suspension for more than thirty days, or fine in an amount exceeding thirty days’ salary, demotion in rank or salary or transfer, removal or dismissal from office.
2017 RACCS.pdf - Free download as PDF File (.pdf) or read online for free. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. .
raccs lawphil CSC Resolution 1701077: 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in SUPREME COURT Manila. EN BANC. G.R. No. 169931 March 12, 2008. ATTY. EMMANUEL R. SISON, ANTONIO FERNANDO, and DR. ARELLANO T. SO, Petitioners, vs. DR.
Section 3. Appeal Memorandum. - The appeal shall be perfected by filing an appeal memorandum in three (3) legible copies with proof of service to the Bureau Director and the adverse party, if any, and upon payment of the applicable fee, Reference Code 127 or 128, provided in the IPO Fee Structure. Section 4 (e) specifies the need for a .raccs lawphil Compilation of rules and regulations issued by the Department of Budget and Management.A.M. No. p-17-3676. ELEANOR OLYMPIAGERONILLA and EMMA OLYMPIA GUTIERREZ, represented by ATTY. BEATRIZ 0. GERONILLA-VILLEGAS, Complainants. vs. RICARDO V. MONTEMAYOR, JR., SHERIFF IV AND ATTY. LUNINGNING CENTRON, CLERK OF COURT VI and EXOFFICIO SHERIFF, Respondents. D E C I S I O N.ALFREDO BENJAMIN S. CAGUIOA Associate Justice. C E R T I F I C A T I O N. Pursuant to the Section 13, Article VIII of the Constitution, I certify that the conclusions in the above Decision had been reached in consultation before the case was assigned to the writer of the opinion of the Court’s Division.
raccs lawphil|CSC Resolution 1701077: 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in
PH0 · The Lawphil Project
PH1 · Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service
PH2 · G.R. No. 248255
PH3 · G.R. No. 222822
PH4 · CSC Resolution 1701077: 2017 Rules on Administrative Cases in
PH5 · CSC Resolution 1101502: Revised Rules on Administrative
PH6 · 2017, CSC
PH7 · 2017 Rules On Administrative Cases in The Civil Service (2017 RACCS)
PH8 · 2017 Rules On Administrative Cases in The Civil Service (2017
PH9 · 2017 Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service
PH10 · 2017 RULES ON ADMINISTRATIVE CASES IN THE CIVIL SERVICE (2017 RACCS)
PH11 · 2017 RULES ON ADMINISTRATIVE CASES IN THE CIVIL SERVICE (201